Profitability, Spirituality

 

And in the way, in which the being -as humanity- organises, it generates a profit, a product, an interest… and it establishes its “beneficial” relations.

And this is one way of... relating, of living together, of investigating, of discovering.

What will you give me; how much will you give me”. “What should I give you, at what percentage”...

Maybe it is not exactly expressed with these words, but… probably, these words are the best way of explaining this living-together of interest; this interested… sharing.  

The saying says: “for interest I like you Andres”, to indicate that the affections, the friendships, the emotive states, etc., that could be generated, depend a lot on the interest that they could produce.

 

And it happens that, usually, this language and these codes... function. That's to say, they follow some rules and patterns that -with some variables- bring a particular result.

“This one invests in…”; “the other one invests with...”

And with all of this, we are referring to, obviously, the personal relations and to the relations of the man with the environment. We are not referring to –obviously- if he invests more or less money, and has more interest or not. Just in case.

But well, in whatever cases -and definitely-, the manifestations of power, of economy and of etcetera’s, are also seen reflected in the interests of the states, of the governments, of the mayors, of the population…

But we repeat that, this, more or less is handled.

 

As it has been supposed, in this coming and going of interests, of benefits, it is not possible to escape from using the same sense with the profit, the spiritual… benefit.

And is it profitable to be a believer? What interest does it produce? Is it profitable to be a Moslem or Christian or Jewish or Hindu or...? What benefits does each option contribute?

 

And it happens that, just as in the mundane day-to-day level the answers have a limited action, when the being enters into the praying sense, when the being introduces it self in the Eternal, this language, this conception, this idea… doesn't fit.

 

It seems –sometimes- that they are unreal worlds, the mystery of the eternity, and our own and tangible reality. It seems like, for moments, that nobody listens and nobody responds.

So expectant for a prize, of a gratification, of recognition that later is not produced when the person was waiting for it…

This on one hand. And on the other, the presentation of one’s own documents: that's to say, of the merits, of the results, of... what has been done -which well deserves a reward-.

 

Are they answers, what we interpret as such? Or what happens -that we attribute to the Mysterious- does not have anything to do with any answer, and it is only part of the strategy of life?

 

On the other hand, in seeing that the rules weren’t fulfilled, the philosophic and religious thoughts promised benefit and interest, after. Not now. And like this, the business is, well… guaranteed. That's to say that, although the sums don't add up here, don't worry, when you arrive there –“there”- they will give you what you deserve.

Hmmm! And what criteria do they have there to give what you deserve? The same as I have here…?

The same as seeing a woman hanged after being raped -in a common and normal image-…? What will be the regulation, the…? What will be the exchange rate? -Given that it is considered like this-.

 

The result of this religious offer is that, with the three modalities: the incomprehensible -and it is not known if it responds or not, if it is heard or not-; the practical and specific -that more or less I know where they can cheat me, how I can make it profitable, how I can win with this friendship, with this other…-; and that of the future -when I don't have an ordinary consciousness and I have an extraordinary consciousness-, what extraordinary surprises will I have?

 

It is difficult that the mentality of profit, of benefit, of justice, concerning the merits that are made, etc., changes.

The simplest evidence is that... is that, when one has the wish to change, because you have the intuition that “this” is not the best way to live together, to convert, to get along with, is that the spiritual path is drawn upon to ask for, to search that they help us with change, so...

It is an incorporated strategy, to remain in the coordinates of consciousness that we have at present.

“I search for my profits and benefits… I know that it is not the most ethical and aesthetical and adequate… I try to advance in my spiritual life; but it is so difficult!, it is so complex!... It is not so easy to change, they educated me like this…”

The sensation that one has with this approach is that the Divine is stupid, an idiot and is not useful for anything.

 

We've established a level of everyday consciousness in which, really, as the scientists say -not all-, now we don't need God. Our level of consciousness arranges, manages. The spirituality is a pose, many times; and others, it is... a drug.

 

The contact, the praying expression that establishes this moment of the Unison between our ignorance, and the clearly put -up to where one knows- of our doubts, should not be a claim in a profitable beneficial style, but simply an expression, a “something” that fuses with the Creative passing, and that, in some form, in some way, -right!-, I will have the occasion to see it, to feel it, to live it.

 

A very simple notice:

Usually, the being considers how to arrive, how to reach a level of spirituality that connects me to the Eternal, with the Immortal, with the... with the Loving of the Creation:

What can I do to incorporate… the Liberating Spirituality, to the everyday life?

This is a question that the person, with... let's suppose with the best criteria, and with their most clear intentions: “I will do whatever. I am willing, but the will... I even make fasts and a multitude of supplications, but I don't see that my beneficial instincts, my everyday life complexes, my monetary worries are mitigated, but, sometimes, exactly the opposite”.

You make the question very badly. Yes. You have begun from the situation of consciousness that you usually live in –of profit, benefit, change, interest-, in order to relate with the Eternal, the Immortal, the Loving, the Infinite...

Error! Why?, very simple! -Very simple-. You, since… let's say“always”- live in the Eternal, live in the Infinite, live in the Immortal, live in the Love. This is the magma that permits you to exist and live.

The question would be rather: How is it possible that in this magma, I've been capable of creating so much vulgarity? How do I take away… this “creature” from me?

I don't need to see how to apply… No! Now it is applied, now I am applied! I am a product of Eternity! I have always been!...

This is my true state of consciousness! That later it has deteriorated and it has tarnished, but... I don't need to ask myself! “How to deal with…?”, because in reality what I am asking is how to domesticate this Infinity, this Eternal; how to manage it, manipulate it and to make of it a totem pole, give it a figure, make something that... eh!

How can I domesticate God, shit!

 

If the whole series of questions, and concerns about the spiritual experience, begin from the true identity that corresponds to us, faced with the evidences of the Creation, there is no place for the egotistical question of seeing how I combine my spiritual life with my mundane vulgar life. It's that, in the first place, my everyday life, daily, cannot be vulgar; because it doesn't correspond with my identity -as a human being-.

And what happens is that, through a multitude of generations, another projection, another proposal has been generated and so... From there comes the multitude of Eternal questions that are never responded, that never function and that never... How is it possible that in the Creation there never is -if it is the Creation-, the possibility of whatever situation!

 

The circumstantial trap of the reason, the logic and the question, and the false “Samaritanism” that has been created concerning the levels of consciousness, is what makes possible this erroneous path.

So… we have to modify!...

“Let’s see how to deal with all this managing, manipulation -etc.- of the species to which I pertain, inside my immortal identity, marvellous, fantastic, sensational”…

Like this. But I begin from the base of what I am. I don't begin from the base of the “poor little one”, let's see if they give me a little more!

 

The Creation is -beneath whatever moment, history or circumstance - incorruptible, it cannot be domesticated...

Better would be to stop to worry about it and to search for the mundane and every day interests, than to try “uselessly” to convince the Creation that it couples to our interests.And in the way, in which the being -as humanity- organises, it generates a profit, a product, an interest… and it establishes its “beneficial” relations.

And this is one way of... relating, of living together, of investigating, of discovering.

What will you give me; how much will you give me”. “What should I give you, at what percentage”...

Maybe it is not exactly expressed with these words, but… probably, these words are the best way of explaining this living-together of interest; this interested… sharing.  

The saying says: “for interest I like you Andres”, to indicate that the affections, the friendships, the emotive states, etc., that could be generated, depend a lot on the interest that they could produce.

 

And it happens that, usually, this language and these codes... function. That's to say, they follow some rules and patterns that -with some variables- bring a particular result.

“This one invests in…”; “the other one invests with...”

And with all of this, we are referring to, obviously, the personal relations and to the relations of the man with the environment. We are not referring to –obviously- if he invests more or less money, and has more interest or not. Just in case.

But well, in whatever cases -and definitely-, the manifestations of power, of economy and of etcetera’s, are also seen reflected in the interests of the states, of the governments, of the mayors, of the population…

But we repeat that, this, more or less is handled.

 

As it has been supposed, in this coming and going of interests, of benefits, it is not possible to escape from using the same sense with the profit, the spiritual… benefit.

And is it profitable to be a believer? What interest does it produce? Is it profitable to be a Moslem or Christian or Jewish or Hindu or...? What benefits does each option contribute?

 

And it happens that, just as in the mundane day-to-day level the answers have a limited action, when the being enters into the praying sense, when the being introduces it self in the Eternal, this language, this conception, this idea… doesn't fit.

 

It seems –sometimes- that they are unreal worlds, the mystery of the eternity, and our own and tangible reality. It seems like, for moments, that nobody listens and nobody responds.

So expectant for a prize, of a gratification, of recognition that later is not produced when the person was waiting for it…

This on one hand. And on the other, the presentation of one’s own documents: that's to say, of the merits, of the results, of... what has been done -which well deserves a reward-.

 

Are they answers, what we interpret as such? Or what happens -that we attribute to the Mysterious- does not have anything to do with any answer, and it is only part of the strategy of life?

 

On the other hand, in seeing that the rules weren’t fulfilled, the philosophic and religious thoughts promised benefit and interest, after. Not now. And like this, the business is, well… guaranteed. That's to say that, although the sums don't add up here, don't worry, when you arrive there –“there”- they will give you what you deserve.

Hmmm! And what criteria do they have there to give what you deserve? The same as I have here…?

The same as seeing a woman hanged after being raped -in a common and normal image-…? What will be the regulation, the…? What will be the exchange rate? -Given that it is considered like this-.

 

The result of this religious offer is that, with the three modalities: the incomprehensible -and it is not known if it responds or not, if it is heard or not-; the practical and specific -that more or less I know where they can cheat me, how I can make it profitable, how I can win with this friendship, with this other…-; and that of the future -when I don't have an ordinary consciousness and I have an extraordinary consciousness-, what extraordinary surprises will I have?

 

It is difficult that the mentality of profit, of benefit, of justice, concerning the merits that are made, etc., changes.

The simplest evidence is that... is that, when one has the wish to change, because you have the intuition that “this” is not the best way to live together, to convert, to get along with, is that the spiritual path is drawn upon to ask for, to search that they help us with change, so...

It is an incorporated strategy, to remain in the coordinates of consciousness that we have at present.

“I search for my profits and benefits… I know that it is not the most ethical and aesthetical and adequate… I try to advance in my spiritual life; but it is so difficult!, it is so complex!... It is not so easy to change, they educated me like this…”

The sensation that one has with this approach is that the Divine is stupid, an idiot and is not useful for anything.

 

We've established a level of everyday consciousness in which, really, as the scientists say -not all-, now we don't need God. Our level of consciousness arranges, manages. The spirituality is a pose, many times; and others, it is... a drug.

 

The contact, the praying expression that establishes this moment of the Unison between our ignorance, and the clearly put -up to where one knows- of our doubts, should not be a claim in a profitable beneficial style, but simply an expression, a “something” that fuses with the Creative passing, and that, in some form, in some way, -right!-, I will have the occasion to see it, to feel it, to live it.

 

A very simple notice:

Usually, the being considers how to arrive, how to reach a level of spirituality that connects me to the Eternal, with the Immortal, with the... with the Loving of the Creation:

What can I do to incorporate… the Liberating Spirituality, to the everyday life?

This is a question that the person, with... let's suppose with the best criteria, and with their most clear intentions: “I will do whatever. I am willing, but the will... I even make fasts and a multitude of supplications, but I don't see that my beneficial instincts, my everyday life complexes, my monetary worries are mitigated, but, sometimes, exactly the opposite”.

You make the question very badly. Yes. You have begun from the situation of consciousness that you usually live in –of profit, benefit, change, interest-, in order to relate with the Eternal, the Immortal, the Loving, the Infinite...

Error! Why?, very simple! -Very simple-. You, since… let's say“always”- live in the Eternal, live in the Infinite, live in the Immortal, live in the Love. This is the magma that permits you to exist and live.

The question would be rather: How is it possible that in this magma, I've been capable of creating so much vulgarity? How do I take away… this “creature” from me?

I don't need to see how to apply… No! Now it is applied, now I am applied! I am a product of Eternity! I have always been!...

This is my true state of consciousness! That later it has deteriorated and it has tarnished, but... I don't need to ask myself! “How to deal with…?”, because in reality what I am asking is how to domesticate this Infinity, this Eternal; how to manage it, manipulate it and to make of it a totem pole, give it a figure, make something that... eh!

How can I domesticate God, shit!

 

If the whole series of questions, and concerns about the spiritual experience, begin from the true identity that corresponds to us, faced with the evidences of the Creation, there is no place for the egotistical question of seeing how I combine my spiritual life with my mundane vulgar life. It's that, in the first place, my everyday life, daily, cannot be vulgar; because it doesn't correspond with my identity -as a human being-.

And what happens is that, through a multitude of generations, another projection, another proposal has been generated and so... From there comes the multitude of Eternal questions that are never responded, that never function and that never... How is it possible that in the Creation there never is -if it is the Creation-, the possibility of whatever situation!

 

The circumstantial trap of the reason, the logic and the question, and the false “Samaritanism” that has been created concerning the levels of consciousness, is what makes possible this erroneous path.

So… we have to modify!...

“Let’s see how to deal with all this managing, manipulation -etc.- of the species to which I pertain, inside my immortal identity, marvellous, fantastic, sensational”…

Like this. But I begin from the base of what I am. I don't begin from the base of the “poor little one”, let's see if they give me a little more!

 

The Creation is -beneath whatever moment, history or circumstance - incorruptible, it cannot be domesticated...

Better would be to stop to worry about it and to search for the mundane and every day interests, than to try “uselessly” to convince the Creation that it couples to our interests.

TIAN

TIAN

Main centre of Neijing School
RADIO AND TV

RADIO AND TV

Our communication channel
FEMININE INSPIRATION

FEMININE INSPIRATION

Feminine Inspiration Association
HEADQUARTERS

HEADQUARTERS

Neijing Schools in the world